Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Experiment Write-Up


­Abstract
I decided to conduct the Tower if Hanoi study. The study was conducted in order to determine if grade level had any affect on number of moves taken to solve the puzzle. It was also performed in order to determine what problem solving strategies work and why this relatively simple puzzle was so difficult. This research involved having participants try the classic puzzle game: the Tower of Hanoi. Participants had three disks on peg A that they needed to move to peg C. The two rules were that only one peg could be moved at a time and larger disks could not be placed on smaller ones. After their results were recorded, participants were asked what specific strategy they used. We found that there is almost no correlation between grade level and number of moves taken in solving the Tower of Hanoi. However, we did find out why the Tower is such a complicated puzzle. It has a series of intermediate steps that must be performed in a certain order. Participants must complete the puzzles in their mind s before starting it in order to complete it in the east number of moves. Envisioning the intermediate steps seemed like the biggest problem. It was interpreted by this study that these problem-solving skills are not based on age, they are based on the individual. Some tenth graders performed better than seniors, not as a result of age but because of individual differences.



Introduction
After reading about the Tower of Hanoi experiment (Medin, Ross, & Markman 2005) and abstract thinking that the puzzle forces (Knoblock 1990), the study was conducted. In the Tower of Hanoi, there is a starting point, an end point, and space in between to solve the problem. It has a series of an intermediate steps, which due to memory limitations, makes this simple problem difficult to complete in 7 moves. Before we conducted the study we believed that because older students have a more developed ability to think abstractly, that they would be able to solve the puzzle more efficiently than younger students. This study was conducted with students that were not randomly selected and has no particular scientific merit. This study shows that there is no correlation between grade and number of moves taken to solve the Tower of Hanoi.



Materials and Methods
21 students, 7 sophomores, 7 juniors, 7 seniors, who I selected were studied. Each participants completed the puzzle online at: http://www.softschools.com/games/logic_games/tower_of_hanoi/  This website game keeps track of both time and number of moves. I recorded their grade level and their results. The subjects were not randomly selected and there were no experimental or control groups. After they completed the puzzle, I asked them what their specific strategies were. Results were plotted on a scatter plot to determine the correlation between grade level and number of moves.



Results
We found that there was little to no correlation between grade level and number of moves made to solve the Tower of Hanoi. Through the question asking for strategy, we learned that the most common problem was becoming fixated on keeping the tower together and focusing on the end result instead of the intermediate steps.








Discussion
Due to the fact there was no correlation between grade level and number of moves used to solve the puzzle, it can be interpreted from this study that problem-solving skills used to solve this puzzle are not a result of age, but rather a result on another factor that contributes to individual differences. After each participant completed the study, I asked what approach or strategy they used to attack this relatively simple puzzle. There was a common strategy, to keep the tower together. The mental block that takes place is that participants see a starting point, they see an end point, they know how to make intermediate steps, but they don’t know which intermediate steps to take. The most critical aspect of this game is moving the smallest disk to peg C instead of B. To do this one must realize that they need disk two to go to peg B in order to get Disk three to peg C. Most of the participants that didn’t do it iin the minimum number of moves, failed to think two steps ahead and were not economical when it came to moving disk 1. The abstract and diverse thinking associated with creativity must be correlated with the ability to envision a series steps.



Literature Cited
Medin, D.L., Ross, B.H., & Markman, A.B. (2005) Cognitive Psychology (4th ed.). Hoboken NJ: Wiley
Knoblock, Craig A. (1990) Abstracting the Tower of Hanoi. Carnegie Mellon University


Friday, May 31, 2013

My Experiment- The Tower of Hanoi

I have decided that I will conduct the Tower of Hanoi study.

It is a mathematical problem in which you must move the stack of disks from the left peg to the right peg. There are two rules: first you can only move one disk at a time and second larger disks cannot be placed on smaller ones. This problem has a start, a series of intermediate steps and a target. I am researching to find out how different people approach a rather simple problem and what their results are
One of my friends brought up that this was done in Rise of the Planet of the Apes, where they tested the apes' intellience by asking the to complete the tower. Doing the tower with more then five rings really does require a lot of higher level thinking because you have to think three steps ahead in order to make the proper next step. After hearing about this i had to give it a shot, so I tried 10 discs. It took me over an hour and 2500 moves but I kept patient and eventually figured it out.

Killing Babies, Saving the World - Radiolab

Killing Babies, Saving the World - Radiolab

This Radio Lab brings up a very difficult question, would you smother your baby to save the village?
I enjoyed the episode because it deals with philosophy. Killing the baby to save a village  is based on utilitarian principles, which involves acting to save the most amount of lives. Keeping the baby alive is based on filial obligation. How could someone kill their own baby and, on the other hand, how could you save your baby knowing that the village would die if it coughed? The question is really an impossible one for me as well. I believe that killing the baby is the right thing to do but not many would do it. Morality really involves a higher level of abstract thinking. How do my actions affect the greater good? They also discussed the Flynn Effect, which is the general trend of generations to increase IQ over time. He says that in the last century, people have learned to think abstractly. This means that our morality levels are increasing. This means that over the past one hundred years, people have developed their abstract thinking and this could lead to a strengthening of morality.

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Email to Psychologist Daryl Bem


Dear Mr. Bem,
Hello, my name is Jatin Bharwani and I'm an AP Psychology student  in New York. Even though I am interested in going into physics or engineering I decided to take Psychology because I was very interested in the social and logical aspects of psychology. I am really interested in social influences as well as problem solving. Part of our final project in psychology was to contact a psychologist and I decided to contact you because you are also interested in both physics and psychology. Also, I had a couple of questions to ask you:


1.What inspired you to go into psychology?

2. Do you have any advice for someone aiming to work in research science?

Thank You Very Much,
Jatin Bharwani

Weekly Update

This week in Psych we've been in the computer lab working on other aspects of our blog, like conducting our own experiments, contacting a psychologist, and listening to radiolabs. Mr. Hayes did conduct an experiment of his own. He had our class and his other classes guess how many grains were in a jar in order to see if crowd wisdom was accurate or not. He has not yet told us his results.

Friday, May 24, 2013

Therapy Dialogue

Click Here

Fight Club!!!!

This week in psych we watched Fight Club! To be honest, I really had no idea what exactly was going on for the first hour. Filled with long annoying narrations, a confusing plot, and strange music, Fight Club was a very long and weird movie. However, I actually started enjoying the movie after the exposition. Although, I still don't understand the appeal to a Fight Club. Evolutionarily speaking, it has always been in our best interest to avoid unnecessary fights, but in this movie, fighting is worthwhile. I can't figure out the appeal of fighting. Overall, I give it a 3 out of 5, mainly because it was very entertaining with a couple of really good twists.

I would not recommend watching this on Family Movie Night...